Answers To The 3 M Business Case Published By Harvard Business School
Summary: Keeping the "pace" of innovation is a primary objective to 3M managers and the success of Computer Privacy Screen project, by itself, is irrelevant in the scope of maintaining such entrepreneurial flow. Assuming this project fits into the desired "pace" of innovation, Guehler should approve it; Wong should support it unconditionally.
Intrapreneurship at 3M: With a requirement that divisions derive 30% of sales from products introduced within the last four years, the "15% rule," and a heavy R&D budget (6-7% of sales) to back it up; 3M is serious about innovation. The organizational requirements for such corporate renewal are demanding and management plays a significant role in encouraging intrapreneurship. Because products belong to divisions and technology belongs to the company, 3M is able to continually innovate on new products by utilizing existing technologies. It is important for divisions to focus on differentiated products and defensible product-market positions. The combination of "innovation-based entrepreneurship" and "well-intentioned failure," means that building on existing technologies from different perspectives is crucial to success.
Andy Wong: his role as a front-line manager/entrepreneur, is to promote the ideas of his group, a lack of support could be harmful to the motivation of the group and ultimately to the crucial flow of new ideas. There is only one option acceptable to Wong in handling the AFE: approve it, even if Guehler ultimately overrules his decision.
Paul Guehler: As a middle-level manager he must objectively consider if this project meets the appropriate criteria outlined by executive management. The basis of "the 15% rule" relies on individuals to take...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%
This is a five forces analysis for the "Cola Wars" Harvard Business School case.746 words - 3 pages Untitled 5) The Cola Wars have been raging for many...
Harvard Business School Case Study #9-601-142 Moore Medical Corporation861 words - 3 pages What problems and challenges are faced by Moore at the time of the case?Moore Medical Corporation is strategically focusing on practitioner business by offering a relatively broad product range (thereby providing ?one-stop shopping?.Moore Medical is a medium-sized distributor of medical supplies to practitioners such as podiatrists and emergency medical technicians. Up to the time of the case, it has relied on traditional...
Harvard business case on Schott Zeiss2613 words - 10 pages QUESTION 1What are the competitive forces Carl Zeiss is faced with?In finding out with what competitive forces Zeiss is confronted with, Porter's five forces model will be used to examine the business environment: Industry competitorsAs of the mid 1970s, Carl Zeiss' competitive position began to erode,...
Barilla SpA - Harvard Business Case Analysis1952 words - 8 pages Overview:Industry* Mature product by 1990. Little or no growth domestically (Italy)* Export market experiencing large growth (20-25% per yr in European countries)Expect 2/3 of new demand from Eastern European market. Demand is high because they wanted low-priced basic food products* Limited or no seasonal demand* Highly competitive domestically over 2000 pasta manufacturers in Italy. Declining...
3M Corporation Business Analysis3353 words - 13 pages 3M Corporation Business Analysis Company Background: The Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Corporation (3M) was founded in 1902. It reported sales revenues of $16.7 billion during the year 2000. These revenues came from 3M's six business divisions: industrial; transportation, graphics, and safety;...
3M Business Analysis1098 words - 4 pages 1. How the 3 M innovation process evolved from the time the company was found? Answer: The innovation process at 3M has typically been a focus area for the upper management. The company had taken a getoutoftheway attitude towards the product developers who in turn have worked accordingly towards innovation. Along with technicians each team had a process engineer to ensure that the product was efficiently made. The entire team...
This is an analysis of the Harvard business school case on Airborne Express. It is a bit specific but definitely contains all necessary information.1556 words - 6 pages 1)Airborne's performance from 1986-1997 can be described as dismal. Throughout the period the company managed to remain profitable every year, but they underperformed the McGahan averages. Airborne averaged 1.72% ROS (including 1997, which was an outlier for this set), 2.46% ROA, and 9.34% ROE. This was compared to the ROS, ROA, and ROE of 4.7%, 5.9%, and 12.6%, respectively. Airborne also had lower margins than its competitors,
Harvard Business School case: Smithkline Beecham. Corporate strategy. Scope, Scale,5 forces, SWOT, Direction, long term, Competitive advantages, Stakeholders.3045 words - 12 pages 1.DirectionThe first key concept of strategy is the direction the company wants to follow. The direction of SmithKline Beecham clearly adjusts in order to cope with the increasing competition in the pharmaceutical industry.In 1989, SmithKline Beecham was formed out of a merger of SmithKline Beckman and the...
Guidant - Harvard business study1856 words - 7 pages Summary:In late 1994, five medical device companies, namely, Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Devices for Vascular Intervention, Inc., Cardiac Rhythm management Business, Heart Rhythm Technologies, Inc., and Origin Medsystems, Inc., has been combined to form Guidant Corporation. Formerly...
Harvard Business Review: Carter Racing Case. A management communication analysis.1000 words - 4 pages This is a really tough decision and the mind is constantly changing against to the conclusion. But after a thorough consideration, I don't think the team should race this time. John should get more data and information for the engine failure until he decides to race again for the next season. There are numerous ways to decide to race or not for John Carter when it comes to
CRM at Moore Medical Corporation - Response to questions about Harvard Business Review Case #9-601-142 Moore Medical Corporation.3722 words - 15 pages Question 1: (a) Which new info system (CRM, ERP, etc), if any, should Moore purchase?In 2001, Linda Autore, CEO of Moore Medical Corporation, was faced with several significant company-wide problems that needed addressing. Each problem posed a specific challenge for Autore. For example, share of wallet of current customers was not close to...
Table of Content
3M’S CORE COMPETENCY
3M’S SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENTAL FORCES
3M’S ACQUISITION STRATEGY
Creating an innovative Culture
Having a bottom-up Organizational Structure / Management Support
EFFICIENT CREATION OF SYNERGIES
The following report assesses the strategic performance of 3M in 2006 by evaluating its core competence, its competitive advantage and its strategy used to reach 3M’s mission which is defined as “Solving and delivering unique solutions for original equipment manufacturers and mass channel customers”. This analysis brings forward a set of recommendations, consisting of an integrated set of actions which will exploit the company’s competences more efficiently and therefore maximize value and enhance the company’s strategic competitiveness in the future.
3M’s Core Competency
To be a successful business, a company needs to develop core competences and base its strategies and its products on those. Core competences are defined as the collective learning within the organization; especially about the coordination of diverse production skills and the integration of multiple streams of technologies (Prahalad&Hamel, 1990, p. 82). These competences are business processes that fulfill the following criteria:
- Provide potential access to wide range of markets
- Contribute to the perceived customer benefits of the end product
- Difficult for competitors to imitate
Furthermore, one important aspect of core competences is that they do not diminish with use (Prahalad&Hamel, 1990). The connection between competences and a company’s end products can be seen in the following graphic:
Graphic 1 - Competencies: The Roots of Competitiveness
(Prahalad&Hamel, 1990, p.81)
illustration not visible in this excerpt
In the case of 3M, their core competences are being innovative and creating synergies between different industries. The company has a “unique model of a technology and manufacturing adjacency lattice that shares basic technologies and manufacturing processes across multiple businesses, markets and product lines” (Case 3M).
Most of 3M’s basic businesses are connected to each other in this way rather than being isolated from each other, therefore basing all of their products on their core competences.
3M’s Sustainable Competitive Advantage
A competitive advantage exists, “when a firm is implementing a value creating strategy not simultaneously being implemented by any current or potential competitors. A firm is said to have a sustained competitive advantage when it is implementing a value creating strategy not simultaneously being implemented by any current or potential competitors and when these other firms are unable to duplicate the benefits of this strategy ” (Barney, 1991, p.102). This definition is based on two assumptions:
- Resource heterogeneity, and
- Resource immobility
Following from this, a company can obtain a sustainable competitive advantage, if it operates in a market/industry in which resources are heterogeneous and immobile, and its resources are valuable, rare, imperfectly imitable and non-substitutionable.
Graphic 2 - Relationship between Resource Heterogeneity, Resource Immobility, VRIO and sustained competitive advantage
illustration not visible in this excerpt
(Barney, 1991, p. 112)
3M’s sustainable competitive advantage is based on their capability to combine scientific, engineering and manufacturing competency throughout different technology platforms in order to serve their niche markets. Within those technology platforms 3M has gained a tremendous knowledge and is able to use this comprehension to develop new products for different markets. Thereby a huge amount of linkages are formed between each technology platform and each market. This cross business enables 3M an internal technology transferring and sharing.
To test the potential of 3M’s competitive advantage Barney’s VRIO framework is used.
The value of the technology exchange is reflected in boosting innovation. Thus one technology platform can generate profits in different industries. In reverse, one market can benefit from the expertise of varying technology platforms. This provides a high value for 3M’s competitive advantage.
There is a necessity for high financial recourses to secure the rareness of this competitive advantage. Therefore, only large companies are potentially able to enter this monetary commitment. The rareness is hence given.
This complex system of technology exchange among several markets is due to the experience of over 100 years. During this period the coordination was further developed and adapted according to the market situation and needs of the company. The history of depended condition leads to an imperfect imitability.
From the organizational point of view 3M has built its company to support the technology exchange in the best way. However, there is still potential available for further improvements when it comes to the efficiency of the logistic structure of 3M (out of a theoretical point of view).
Reviewing the VRIO framework one can say that 3M has an unexploited competitive advantage. But since a perfect organizational structure can be hardly performed a sustainable competitive advantage can be awarded.
External Environmental Forces
3M is an international company, which is not only active in its domestic market in the United States, but also all over the world where 3M is generating more than 60% of its sales in mid- 2006. Therefore, it has to cope with global issues and global environmental forces, especially since the company decided to concentrate on countries like Russia or China for its international growth. However, these countries and markets bear some political and legal issues and challenges.