Utilitarianism Euthanasia Essay Hook

Voluntary Euthanasia: What's Right And Wrong?

Voluntary euthanasia can be defined as allowing a terminally ill patient an opportunity to end their lives early, peacefully and humanely. Dr. Jack Kevorkian and Sir Terry Pratchett are two men who faced and are facing time in jail due to being pro voluntary euthanasia. Diane Pretty and Vincent Humbert are two people who's lives have been affected negatively by being pro voluntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia should be made legal in all states because every person should have the right to die in dignity and peace when they choose to. However, others choose to argue voluntary euthanasia, should remain illegal because it goes against the Catholic and Christian religions. There is also belief, voluntary euthanasia defeats the goals of a doctor's job. Some are concerned about the patient's sanity at the time and argue the patient may not be fully competent and does not understand what choices they are making. Others stress, if voluntary euthanasia is legalized, involuntary euthanasia will soon to follow. Involuntary euthanasia ends a patients life without their consent. Despite the fear of involuntary euthanasia becoming legal and ethical beliefs, voluntary euthanasia should be made legal as long as the person has the voice left to choose to end their life. Voluntary euthanasia is currently legal in states such as Washington, Oregon, and Montana. Euthanasia is legal in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. Australia is fighting to have voluntary euthanasia legalized. If so many people are for voluntary euthanasia, why make a patient in pain suffer and live their life miserably? Why do we have the right to choose when their lives end? I do not want to die in a hospital bed in pain and depressed relying on other people for everything. Instead, I would like to die at peace with myself and in dignity. No one should have to suffer knowing they can not get better. These questions began the fight to legalize euthanasia in 1906. According to the Voluntary Euthanasia Society of Whales, the first bill introduced and denied for legalizing the right to die movement was at the Ohio State Legislature in 1906. Soon after, in 1938 Reverend Charles Francis Potter created the Euthanasia Society of America. Eventually in 1967, a new concept entitled, the "Living Will" came into focus. This gave the patient the right to choose if they wish to die when terminally ill. Now, legal wills are in 40 states and many countries (Voluntary Euthanasia Society of England and Wales).
As a result of the “Living Will”, The Voluntary Patient Self Determination Act was created in 1991. Chitty explains how the act gave patients the legal right...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

right and wrong Essay

857 words - 3 pages In the passage, Ethical Relativism: Who's to Judge What's Right and Wrong? had a absolutist point of view. As an absolutist, I agree and think it is not what culture defines as moral to actually be moral at all. For example, If I start believing in a pebble and tell everyone that the pebble is a god; They believe in it yet it...

Physician Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Active- Euthanasia: A Closer Look

2456 words - 10 pages Physician Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Active Euthanasia: A Closer LookThesisIn this essay, I will first argue that physician assisted suicide (PAS) is morally easier to defend than voluntary active euthanasia (VAE), maintaining the view that the patient must take full responsibility for his/her actions...

Title: two theories of right and wrong

1284 words - 5 pages Two Theories of Right and WrongJohn Stuart Mill, author of the essay entitled Utilitarianism, gave an in depth theory of right and wrong commonly referred to as utility or the utilitarian view of morality. Utility claims thatactions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is...

Louis Pojman’s Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong

1816 words - 7 pages Utilitarianism is a theory which states that the purpose of morality is to achieve maximal goodness in a society. It is consequentialist rather than deontological in that the moral value of ethical decisions are to be judged in terms of their effects, rather than the intrinsic properties of the acts themselves. Those effects are deemed good which generate the most pleasure or happiness, or which minimize overall pain. There are two...

Euthanasia and Aging: The Right to Die

1961 words - 8 pages Euthanasia: Is it a Right?It is time to take your head out of the sand and look at the subject of euthanasia. Many people are for it when it comes to people of elderly years. Many are against it for anyone. There are still more who look the other way and hope someone will decide the issue for them. It is against the law in most of America. It is legal in the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Oregon, USA. Should we head toward a universal law on...

Moral right and wrong are just a matter of opinion.

1547 words - 6 pages The Concise Oxford Dictionary (p925) describes morality as: '1) Principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behaviour; a system of value and moral principles. 2) The extent to which an action is right or wrong'. What is morally right in relation to one moral framework can be morally wrong in...

Actions and Their Labels of Either Right or Wrong

1826 words - 7 pages Actions and Their Labels of Either Right or Wrong In this academic essay there will be an in depth look at the words of Mill, in terms of actions and their labels of either right and wrong, and those connotations to happiness and, so to speak the reverse of happiness. There will be an attempt through various different channels, to illustrate the absurdity of utilitarianism, in the sense of its mere provisional assessment...

Euthanasia: The Right to a Peaceful and Merciful Death

2152 words - 9 pages The arrogance of mankind has dampened the hope that individuals can achieve a dignified death. "Science says: 'We must live,' and seeks the means of prolonging, increasing, facilitating, and amplifying life, of making it tolerable and acceptable, wisdom says: 'We must die' and seeks how to make us die well." - M. De Unamund sss. Whoosh. Hum. Beep. Slurp. A clock alerts her. Time to flip him over. The tired woman struggles to lift the...

Who is to Judge What is Right and What is Wrong?

592 words - 2 pages Since there are so many "moralities" as there are people and cultures, who is to judge what is Right and what is Wrong? Whose morality do we ought to follow and why? To answer this question one must first come to a clear understanding of the meaning of right and wrong- a topic that has become so subjective and distorted that it is practically impossible to clearly define. Individuals have come to create their own morality so that what is...

Corporate Charities The Right and Wrong Ways for Big Business to Give Back to the Community

4462 words - 18 pages Corporate Charities The Right and Wrong Ways for Big Business to Give Back to the Community Introduction Why do people who have money feel inclined to give it away? Throughout history, reasons for philanthropy have ranged from guilt to concern for personal image, from religious principles to simple generosity. America is awash with corporate CEO’s who have so much money that they could never spend it in a lifetime. What is...

Right and Wrong in The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde and A Streetcar Named Desire by Tennesse Williams

2418 words - 10 pages Morality, defined as the “beliefs about what is right behavior and what is wrong behavior,”(“Morality”) is the substructure of our integrity and the column of virtuousness. The opposite of this, immorality, is the corruption of one’s being, becoming more wicked in nature. With morals, a person is held to a certain set of standards and demeanor, but if these morals were to become corrupted, a person’s moral boundaries would crumble, leaving the...

Essay on Utilitarianism and the Case for Euthanasia

1353 Words6 Pages

Unitarianism and the Case for Euthanasia
One of greatest moral issues facing society today is that of freedom. Freedom is a principle that this country was founded on at the start of its inception. Freedom is still a cause that requires our attention. The great debate on simple liberties such as the right to decide what happens to one’s body is still an issue that society has failed to resolve. It is a moral quandary that will continue to be discussed and a deliberated on as long as humankind are free moral agents with personal moral preferences. The question is do we allow our personal preferences to impede the decisions of other individuals? If we have the right to have our set of moral preferences do, other individuals deserve that same…show more content…

According to Rachels, “It is [incorrect] to say that in passive euthanasia the doctor does nothing, for he does do one thing that is very important: he lets the patient die. "Letting someone die" is certainly different, in some respects, from other types of action - mainly in that it is a kind of action that one may perform by way of not performing certain other actions. (Rachels, 79)” Inaction in itself is still an action. A person makes a decision to respond or not to respond. The decision is the act. The central question for debate is do we have a right as a nation to evaluate another person’s level of suffering?
It is essential to establish whether we have a right to decide a person’s capacity to endure suffering. The experience of suffering differs from person to person. Are there any rational ways of determining what suffering consist of for a group of people? Is it ever morally acceptable to allow a person to suffer? Do we have the right as a nation to step in to mitigate a person’s suffering?
One can debate whether a government agency has the right to intervene on behalf of individuals due to suffering in the case of child abuse. If a child is in a home that inflicts suffering to the child by way of starvation or physical abuse it is the responsibility of the governing agency to intercede for the sake of the child. Governing agencies have laws set in place

Show More

0 Thoughts to “Utilitarianism Euthanasia Essay Hook

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *