Critical Review Example Essay In Apa

An Article Review is a critical, constructive evaluation of literature in a particular field through summary, classification, analysis, and comparison. If it is a scientific review article, it uses database searches to portray the research.

An article review gives scholars or students the opportunity to analyze and evaluate the work of other experts in a given field. Outside of the education system, experts often review the work of their peers for clarity, originality, and contribution to the discipline of study. When answering the question of what is an article review, you must understand the depth of analysis and evaluation that your instructor is seeking.


Table Of Contents


What Is An Article Review

It is, therefore, professional custom writing, which demands high standards of writing and in-depth presentation of arguments. Your main goal is to review the topic, summarize everything and present a clear understanding of the topic you’ve been working on.

Writing involves:

  • Summarization, classification, analysis, critiques, and comparison.

  • The analysis, evaluation, and comparison require use theories, ideas, and research, relevant to the subject area of the article.

  • It is also worth nothing if review does not introduce new information, but rather presents a response to another writer’s work.

  • Check out other samples to gain a better understanding of how to review the article.

Some Types Of Review

Journal

Much like all other reviews, a journal article review evaluates strengths and weaknesses of an article. A qualified paper writer must provide the reader with an analysis and interpretation that demonstrates the article’s value.

Research

A research article review differs from a journal article review by the way that it evaluates the research method used and holds that information in retrospect to analysis and critique.

Science

Scientific article review involves anything in the realm of science. Often, scientific articles include more information on the background that you can use to analyze the article in a more comprehensive way.

Formatting An Article Review

An Article review format can be very broad. The format of your paper should always adhere to the citation style assigned to you by your professor. If you’re not sure, seek clarification on the preferred format and ask him to clarify several other pointers to adequately complete the formatting of an article review.

How many articles should you review?

  • In what format should you cite your articles (MLA, APA, ASA, Chicago, etc.)?
  • What length should your review be?
  • Should you include summary, critique, or a personal opinion in your article?
  • Do you need to call attention to a theme or central idea within the articles?
  • Does your instructor require background information?

When you know the answers to these questions, you may embark on writing your literature review. Below are examples of MLA and APA formats, as those are the two most common citation styles.

Using the APA Format

Articles appear most commonly in academic journals, newspapers, and electronic websites. An article review: APA format will have a certain format in the works cited page.

  • Web Article: Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month Date of Publication). Article title. Retrieved from {link}

  • Journal Article: Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Publication Year). Article title.Periodical Title, Volume(Issue), pp.-pp.

  • Newspaper Article: Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month Date of Publication). Article title. Magazine Title, pp. xx-xx.

Using MLA Format

  • Web Article: Last, First Middle Initial. “Article Title.”Website Title. Website Publisher, Date Month Year Published. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.

  • Newspaper Article: Last, First M. “Article Title.” Newspaper Title [City] Date, Month, Year Published: Page(s). Print.

  • Journal Article: Last, First M. “Article Title.” Journal Title Series Volume.Issue (Year Published): Page(s). Database Name. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.

The Pre-Writing Process

Organization in an assignment like this is of utmost importance. Before embarking on your writing process, you could outline your assignment or use an article review template to organize your thoughts in a more coherent way.

  • Start with an introduction that mentions the article and a thesis for the review
  • Follows with a summary of the main points of the article
  • Highlights the positive points and facts presented in the article
  • Critique of the article through identification of gaps, contradictions, disparities in the text, and unanswered questions

Outline And Template

As you progress with reading your article, organize your thoughts into coherent sections in an outline. As you read, jot down important facts, contributions, or contradictions. Identify shortcomings and strengths of your article. Begin to map your outline accordingly.

If your professor does not want a summary section or a personal critique section, then you must alleviate those parts from your writing. Much like other assignments, an article review must contain an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. Thus you might consider dividing your outline according to these sections as well as subheadings within the body. If you find yourself troubled with the prewriting and the brainstorming process for this assignment, seek out a sample article review outline.

  • Your article must contain these constituent parts:

  • Pre-title page: here, you will want to list the type of the article that you are reviewing, the title of the article, all the authors who contributed to the article, author’s affiliations (position, department, institute, city, state, country, email ID)

  • Optional corresponding author details: name, address, phone number, email and fax number.

  • Running head: *Only in the APA format. It is the title of your paper shortened to less than 40 characters.

  • Summary page: Optional, depending on the demands of your instructor. The summary should be maximum 800 words long. Use simple and non-technical language. Do not repeat text verbatim or give references in this section. Give 1) relevant background 2) explain why the work was done 3) summarize results and explain the method.

  • Title page: whole title, 250 word abstract followed by “Keywords:” and 4-6 keywords.

  • Introduction

  • Body: Include headings and subheadings

  • Works Cited/References

  • Optional Suggested reading page

  • Tables and Figure legends (if instructed by the professor.)

The Post-Writing Process

Summarize the Article

Make a summary of the article by revisiting what the author has written about. Note relevant facts and findings of the article. Include the author's conclusions in this section.

Critique the Article

Present the strengths and weaknesses that you have found in the article. In addition, highlight the knowledge that the author has contributed in the field. Also, write about the gaps and contradictions in the article. Take a standpoint of either supporting or not with the author's assertions but support your arguments with facts and relevant theories that are pertinent to the area of knowledge. Rubrics and templates can also be used to evaluate and grade the person reviewing the article.

Crafting a Conclusion

In this section, revisit the key points of your piece, your findings of the article, and your critique. Also write about the accuracy, validity, and relevance of the results of the article review. Give the way forward for future research in the field of study. Before submitting your article, keep these pointers in mind:

  • As you read your articles, highlight the key points. This will help you pinpoint the article's main argument and the evidence that they use to support that argument.

  • While you write your review, use evidence from your sources to make a point. This is best done using direct quotations.

  • Select quotes and supporting evidence adequately and use direct quotations sparingly. Take a lot of time to analyze your articles.

  • Every time you reference an article or use a direct quotation use a parenthetical citation to avoid accidentally plagiarizing your article.

  • Re-read your piece a day after you finished writing it. This will help you spot grammar mistakes and see any flaws in organization.

  • Use spell-check or get a second opinion on your paper.

Example Of An Article Review

The best way to learn how to write this kind of paper is to look for an article review example online that matches your grade level. Here is a college-level article review sample.

Essay Writing Advice From Our Professional Team

Tutor Charles, from EssayPro

Article review is a subcategory of a literature review. The purpose of an article review is to help you understand your assigned reading material or synthesize and critique a broad range of articles on an individual subject. My advice for writing an article review is to put the article that you are assigned or that you found in your own words. Include important points and make sure your information is accurate. This step is just for your benefit, so don’t spend a lot of time editing your paraphrased content. Once you’ve summarized your article, you can make an outline out of your summary. Decide which parts you want to put into your review. If certain aspects relate to your argument specifically, then make sure to include them. This process will make your writing process much easier. Another tip that I have for you is to remember that a literature review still needs a thesis statement. Make sure to articulate what your review is about in the first paragraph of your essay.

Get Professional Help

Whether you have a blank slate or a draft in hand, you might want extra help writing or editing your article review. You need not worry. EssayPro is an essay service that not only provides paper writing help, but could also assist you with editing and rewriting papers of any education level. Our writers are strictly professional and will write you an assignment worthy of an A. Getting online help has never been this simple!

Try EssayPro service

Critique of a Research Article

The goal of this activity is to give you an opportunity to apply whatever you learned in this course in evaluating a research paper. Warning!!!!You might have done some article summaries or even critical evaluation of some resources. However, this activity is unique because you evaluate a research article from a methodology perspective.

For this assignment you briefly summarize and extensively evaluate the attached educational research article (If you cannot download the article please go to BeachBoard/Content/Articles to download the article). 

 

This assignment should be done individually. In the summary section, you should write a brief (up to 500 words) summary of the article in your own words. Don’t use copy and paste try to rephrase. This will be a good practice for your final project’s literature review. In the critique section, you evaluate the article using the following grading criteria.

Grading criteria for research critique

In your summary, you should identify main elements of the research including

1.        Research problem

2.        Research goal

3.        Hypothesis

4.       Research Questions

5.       Research Method (briefly explain)

6.       Sample (participants)

7.       Variables

8.       Tools (instruments, tests, surveys)

9.       Main findings (brief summary of the results)

10.   Conclusion

The critique part should be 2-3 pages (1000-2000 words) and include to the following sections. Your critique should be longer than your summary and you pay special attention to the design and procedure. Your grade on this assignment is based on your answer the following questions.

There is a long list of questions. You don’t have to address all questions. However, you should address highlighted questions. Some questions are relevant to this article some are not. I listed so many questions simply because I’d like you to learn what to look for in evaluating a research article.

The format of your paper should NOT be like a Q & A list. Instead, you should integrate your answers into an essay format similar to the given examples.

Introduction


Problem

1.     Is there a statement of the problem?

2.     Is the problem “researchable”? That is, can it be investigated through the collection and analysis of data?

3.     Is background information on the problem presented?

4.     Is the educational significance of the problem discussed?

5.     Does the problem statement indicate the variables of interest and the specific relationship between those variables which are investigated? When necessary, are variables directly or operationally defined?


Review of Related Literature

1.     Is the review comprehensive?

2.     Are all cited references relevant to the problem under investigation?

3.     Are most of the sources primary, i.e., are there only a few or no secondary sources?

4.     Have the references been critically analyzed and the results of various studies compared and contrasted, i.e., is the review more than a series of abstracts or annotations?

5.     Does the review conclude with a brief summary of the literature and its implications for the problem investigated?

6.     Do the implications discussed form an empirical or theoretical rationale for the hypotheses which follow?

 

Hypotheses

1.     Are specific questions to be answered listed or specific hypotheses to be tested stated?

2.     Does each hypothesis state an expected relationship or difference?

3.     If necessary, are variables directly or operationally defined?

4.     Is each hypothesis testable?

Method
         Subjects

1.     Are the size and major characteristics of the population studied described?

2.     If a sample was selected, is the method of selecting the sample clearly described?

3.     Is the method of sample selection described one that is likely to result in a representative, unbiased sample?

4.     Did the researcher avoid the use of volunteers?

5.     Are the size and major characteristics of the sample described?

6.     Does the sample size meet the suggested guideline for minimum sample size appropriate for the method of research represented?     


Instruments

1.     Is the rationale given for the selection of the instruments (or measurements) used?

2.     Is each instrument described in terms of purpose and content?

3.     Are the instruments appropriate for measuring the intended variables?

4.     Is evidence presented that indicates that each instrument is appropriate for the sample under study?

5.     Is instrument validity discussed and coefficients given if appropriate?

6.     Is reliability discussed in terms of type and size of reliability coefficients?

7.     If appropriate, are subtest reliabilities given?

8.     If an instrument was developed specifically for the study, are the procedures involved in its development and validation described?

9.     If an instrument was developed specifically for the study, are administration, scoring or tabulating, and interpretation procedures fully described?


Design and Procedure

1.     Is the design appropriate for answering the questions or testing the hypotheses of thestudy?

2.     Are the procedures described in sufficient detail to permit them to be replicated by another researcher?

3.     If a pilot study was conducted, are its execution and results described as well as its impact on the subsequent study?

4.     Are the control procedures described?

5.     Did the researcher discuss or account for any potentially confounding variables that he or she was unable to control for?

 


Results

1.     Are appropriate descriptive or inferential statistics presented?

2.     Was the probability level, α, at which the results of the tests of significance were evaluated,

specified in advance of the data analyses?

3.     If parametric tests were used, is there evidence that the researcher avoided violating the

required assumptions for parametric tests?

4.     Are the tests of significance described appropriate, given the hypotheses and design of the

study?

5.     Was every hypothesis tested?

6.     Are the tests of significance interpreted using the appropriate degrees of freedom?

7.     Are the results clearly presented?

8.     Are the tables and figures (if any) well organized and easy to understand?

9.     Are the data in each table and figure described in the text?


Discussion (Conclusions and Recommendation)

1.     Is each result discussed in terms of the original hypothesis to which it relates?

2.     Is each result discussed in terms of its agreement or disagreement with previous results

obtained by other researchers in other studies?

3.     Are generalizations consistent with the results?

4.     Are the possible effects of uncontrolled variables on the results discussed?

5.     Are theoretical and practical implications of the findings discussed?

6.     Are recommendations for future action made?

7.     Are the suggestions for future action based on practical significance or on statistical

significance only, i.e., has the author avoided confusing practical and statistical

significance?

8.     Are recommendations for future research made?

 

Make sure that you cover the following questions in your critique even if you have already covered them in your crtique.

1.   Is the research important? Why?

2.   In your own words what methods and procedures were used? Evaluate the methods and procedures.

3.   Evaluate the sampling method and the sample used in this study.

4.   Describe the reliability and validity of all the instruments used.

5.   What type of research is this?  Explain.

6.   How was the data analyzed?

7.   What is (are) the major finding(s)? are these findings important?

8.What are your suggestions to improve this research?

 

Help

Here is a hint on how to evaluate an article.

Use this resource for writing and APA style.

Examples (please note some examples are longer than what is expected for this article)

·         Good example

·         Poor example

More examples

·         Original article

·         Article critique

 

0 Thoughts to “Critical Review Example Essay In Apa

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *